| What we measure | Dubai | Phuket |
|---|---|---|
| Nightly rate, high season | €1,050 | €270 |
| Nightly rate, low season | €470 | €110 |
| Nights sold, high season | 95 | 110 |
| Nights sold, low season | 75 | 90 |
| Total nights sold per year | 170 | 200 |
| Gross annual income | €135,000 | €39,100 |
| What an agency takes | 30% | 25% |
| Net, self-managed on a platform | €114,000 | €33,000 |
| Net, through an agency | €94,500 | €29,300 |
All figures on this page are shown in euros, on both sides, so the two columns can be compared. The individual market pages show local currency.
This is where the comparison turns. An agency takes about 30% in Dubai and about 25% in Phuket. Manage the property yourself on a platform and you lose about 15.5% in either. The commission gap can be worth more than the difference in gross, which is why comparing headline revenue alone is how owners get this decision wrong.
Dubai sells 95 nights at €1,050 and 75 outside the peak. Phuket sells 110 at €270 and 90 outside it. Neither of these markets is fragile, which is unusual and worth saying out loud. Both sell a high number of nights across a long season, so a bad month is a dent rather than a disaster. That is a very different asset from a Mediterranean or Alpine home whose entire year rests on two or three weeks, and it is the strongest argument this page can make for either of them.
Because it is the most misleading number in this business, and it is the one every other site quotes. An occupancy rate of 50% sounds moderate. Multiply it by 365 and you have implied 182 nights sold. A seasonal home does not sell 182 nights. It sells the weeks people want and stands empty the rest of the year, and nobody is even trying to rent it in November. The occupancy model overstates seasonal markets by roughly a factor of two. We count nights actually sold, and nothing else.
The Phuket figures were confirmed by an operator who ran villas there, set the prices and paid the staff. The Dubai figures are still our estimate, built from comparable markets and public rate data, and we say so rather than pretend to a certainty we do not have. If you own in Dubai, tell us what you actually earned and this page gets better.
Three questions and we will tell you what yours specifically can earn, not what the market average earns. Free, and free permanently.
Estimate my home →Dubai, by about 246%. Roughly €135,000 a year in Dubai against €39,100 in Phuket, for the same well-maintained 4-bedroom home, professionally marketed. That is gross. What reaches your account depends on whether you self-manage or hand it to an agency, and the gap between those two outcomes is larger than the gap between these two markets.
About 170 in Dubai and 200 in Phuket, on our benchmark. Nights sold, not occupancy. We never quote an occupancy percentage because multiplying one by 365 flatters a seasonal market by roughly a factor of two: the home is not on the market for most of the year, and nobody is trying to sell it in November.
This page cannot tell you, and anyone who claims it can is selling you something. Rental income is one half of a yield. The purchase price is the other half, and it varies more between two streets than it does between two countries. A high gross on a very expensive property is frequently a worse investment than a modest gross on a cheap one. Get both numbers before you decide.
About 30% in Dubai and about 25% in Phuket, of everything the guest pays, before a single bill is settled. Self-managing on a platform costs about 15.5%. Nobody publishes these figures because every party in the chain benefits from the owner not knowing them. Our team has worked both sides of that trade, which is how we know.
Estimates are based on destination benchmarks and property attributes, not on a formal appraisal. Amounts are shown in local currency using approximate conversion rates. Actual results depend on marketing, pricing strategy and seasonality. Last updated 28/07/2026.